Editorial standards

Useful advice earns trust through evidence and honesty.

These standards apply to Laxu Resume articles, guides, method pages, comparisons, and examples. They explain how we separate research, product testing, and personal experience.

Evidence before certainty

Material factual claims should link to the best available primary source. When reliable public evidence does not exist—such as cross-vendor ATS market share—we say that instead of presenting an estimate as fact.

Testing is labeled

Product comparisons distinguish our hands-on tests from vendor-published features. Test conditions, inputs, dates, and limitations should be clear enough for a reader to understand what the result does and does not prove.

Experience is not universal

Personal career stories are labeled as first-person experience. They can offer a useful pattern, but they are not presented as a guaranteed outcome for every applicant.

Commercial relationships are disclosed

Laxu Resume publishes pages comparing its own product with alternatives. We identify that conflict directly. Rankings are not sold, and links are not placed in exchange for payment.

Dates and changes matter

Articles show publication dates and, after a material revision, an updated date. Prices and product capabilities can change; comparison articles should state when those details were last checked.

Corrections stay visible

If a factual error changes the meaning of an article, we correct it promptly and update the article date. Readers can report an issue through our Help page.

Report a correction

Include the article URL, the claim you believe is wrong, and a source when possible. We review correction requests independently of whether they favor Laxu Resume.

Contact support